computer-smartphone-mobile-apple-ipad-technology

Informal Problem Solving Strategies of Fifth Grades In The United Arab Emirates: Indicators Of Algebraic Thinking

IJAES Volume 2, Issue 1, Article 4

Authors

Othman N. Alsawaie

This study investigated how students in grade 5 approached word problems of an algebraic nature. Two problems were used for this purpose, one in the form x + (x + a) + (x + b) = c, and the other in the form ax + bx + cx = d. Data were collected from 82 students from two elementary schools in Al-Ain City, United Arab Emirates. The data consisted of studentsโ€™ written solutions and explanations and follow up interviews with selected students. The results showed that successful and partially successful solutions involved two approaches, the unwind approach and the guess and check approach (both systematic and random). The unwind approach was used in approximately two thirds of the solutions. Unsuccessful solutions involved random guess and check, number manipulation, and arbitrary approaches. Generally, the results support the idea of introducing algebra earlier in school mathematics curricula.

Bednarz, N., & Janvier, B. (1996). Emergence and development of algebra as a problem solving tool: Continuities and discontinuities with arithmetic. In N. Bednarz, C. Kieran, & L. Lee (Eds.), Approaches to algebra (pp. 115โ€“136). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Carraher, D. W., Schlieman, A. D., Brizuela, B. M., & Earnest, D. (2006). Arithmetic and algebra in early mathematics education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 37(2), 87โ€“115.

Driscoll, M. (1999). Fostering algebraic thinking: A guide for teachers grades 6โ€“10. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

Filloy, E., & Rojano, T. (1989). Solving equations: The transition from arithmetic to algebra. For the Learning of Mathematics, 9(2), 19โ€“25.

Fujii, T. (2003). Probing studentsโ€™ understanding of variables through cognitive conflict problems: Is the concept of a variable so difficult for students to understand? In Proceedings of the 2003 Joint Meeting of PME and PMENA (Vol. 1, pp. 49โ€“65). Honolulu, HI, USA.

Herscovics, N., & Linchevski, L. (1994). A cognitive gap between arithmetic and algebra. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 27(1), 59โ€“78.

Irwin, K. C., & Britt, M. S. (2005). The algebraic nature of studentsโ€™ numerical manipulation in the New Zealand Numeracy Project. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 58, 169โ€“188.

Johanning, D. I. (2004). Supporting the development of algebraic thinking in middle school: A closer look at studentsโ€™ informal strategies. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 23, 371โ€“388.

Kaput, J., & Blanton, M. (2001). Algebrafying the elementary mathematics experience. Part I: Transforming task structures. In H. Chick, K. Stacey, & J. Vincent (Eds.), Proceedings of the 12th Conference of the International Commission on Mathematical Instruction (Vol. 1, pp. 344โ€“351). Melbourne, Australia.

Kieran, C. (1989). The early learning of algebra: A structural perspective. In S. Wagner & C. Kieran (Eds.), Research issues in the learning and teaching of algebra (pp. 33โ€“56). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

Kieran, C. (1996). The changing face of school algebra. Invited lecture for ICME-8 Congress, Spain.

Lesh, R., Post, T., & Behr, M. (1987). Dienes revisited: Multiple embodiment in computer environments. In I. Wirzup & R. Streit (Eds.), Developments in school mathematics education around the world (pp. 647โ€“680). Reston, VA: NCTM.

Nathan, M. J., & Koedinger, K. R. (2000). Teachersโ€™ and researchersโ€™ beliefs about the development of algebraic reasoning. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31(2), 168โ€“190.

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.

Smith, E. (2003). Stasis and change: Integrating pattern, functions, and algebra throughout the K-12 curriculum. In J. Kilpatrick, W. G. Martin, & D. Schifter (Eds.), A research companion to principles and standards for school mathematics (pp. 136โ€“150). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

Swafford, J. O., & Langrall, C. W. (2000). Grade 6 studentsโ€™ preinstructional use of equations to describe and represent problem situations. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31, 89โ€“112.

Van Amerom, B. A. (2003). Focusing on informal strategies when linking arithmetic to early algebra. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 54, 63โ€“75.

Loader Loading…
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab
Categories: